Teaching Strategy: The Difference Between Watching and Seeing
Film has layers. In the simplest terms, one layer is images and the other layer is sound. These two layers play simultaneously on the screen and together they create meaning. The first time we screen a film or a scene from a film, we pay attention primarily to these two basic elements. We use our inference and critical-thinking skills, even without realizing that we are, to piece together a narrative. In The Story of Movies, we call this first viewing “watching.” To analyze film as a visual text, however, requires a second, closer viewing, which we call “seeing.” Seeing implies understanding. Now that the viewer knows what happens, he or she can pay attention in the second viewing to how it happens. In the second screening of a film clip, the viewer begins to identify additional layers, and begins to ask and answer questions that lead to greater understanding.
These include the following:
Composition, the selection of images and how they are arranged within the frame. The viewer asks, “Why is the filmmaker showing me these particular images and not others?”
Continuity & Pacing, the juxtaposition and timing of the images. The viewer asks, “Why has the filmmaker arranged the images in this particular sequence?”
Cinematography, including camera distances and angles, lighting and movement. The viewer asks, “Why show these images close up or far away? From a high or a low angle? In brightness or shadow?"
Soundtrack, both visible and invisible sounds, as well as music. The viewer asks, “Why this kind of music at this point? Why is there silence here, but noise there?"
It is a rare person who can peel away all the layers of a film in a single viewing. It simply is not the way we process information. During second and even third screenings of a shot or scene, the viewer will notice new elements.
Try it. Select a short scene, perhaps the opening credits of To Kill a Mockingbird. After viewing it the first time, ask students to explain what has happened. Most will rightly answer that a child (though a child is never seen) has opened a box and seemingly plays with the contents. The child draws a picture of a bird and then tears the picture in half. You might even ask the students to identify the setting or the year. They’ll use inference skills to determine it takes place in the past. After all, the items in the book are old-fashioned — pocket watches, marbles, a whistle, crayons. There are no cell phones or tablets.
After the second viewing, ask questions similar to those above. By showing the pocket watch and adding the sound of it ticking, what was the filmmaker hoping to communicate? Why does the filmmaker show the words TO . . . KILL . . . first and then the rest of the movie title? Why does the child rip the drawing of the bird in half? How would the meaning change if the very first image shown is the torn drawing? At what point does the music begin? How does the music change throughout the sequence of images? What does the music suggest about the child? Questions like these truly challenge students’ observational and critical-thinking skills, and move them beyond read-the-book, watch-the-movie. This first-viewing/second-viewing activity is a teaching strategy used throughout The Story of Movies curriculum.
|